XRX

Xerox Holdings Corporation

NASDAQ · Common stock

2.61

+0.12 (+4.82%)

Close, Oct 20, 2026

Watch

Structural summary

What is the structure, what changed, and what would invalidate it

Viridia Intelligence

Context across dimensions, not a rating

StructureHigher highs, higher lowsIntermediate-degree swings on the daily chart.

WaveDefensiveTriangle complete, next move down (Pattern Confidence 67); the weekly count points the other way.

FibonacciZone belowNearest confluence 2.36–2.41 (3 relationships), −8.6% from the close.

MomentumWeak3 months −1.9% (behind SPY by 4.8 points); 6 months +44.2%.

RegimeMixed−15.4% vs the 50-day average, +6.9% vs the 200-day.

RiskNormal20-day volatility 51% vs 99% over the year; 1-year drawdown −49.6%; beta 2.52.

XRX setup historyNot replayed yet; the track record fills in most-traded securities first.

Current structure

Price, swings and the preferred count on the chart

XRX · 1DLoading bars…

SourceMassive, end of dayUpdated—MethodDaily bars, split-adjusted

Candidate interpretations

Every count shown passes every hard rule

Candidate interpretations

Ranked by Pattern Confidence

Counts ending at the latest intermediate swing high, 3.78 on Jul 30, 2026. 118 labelings tested, 95 broke a hard rule, 12+ remain.

Hard-rule evidence: why 95 labelings were eliminated

60Wave 2 always retraces less than 100% of wave 1
9Price after the last labeled point has not crossed a rule-based invalidation level
8Contracting triangle: C ends short of A's end, D short of B's end, and E short of C's end
6Wave B ends short of the start of wave A (a zigzag is a sharp correction)
3Wave B retraces at least 90% of wave A
3Wave 4 always retraces less than 100% of wave 3

Method Every chain of 3–6 alternating pivots ending at the latest confirmed pivot is tested as each pattern; only counts with zero hard-rule failures are kept, then ranked by Pattern Confidence. Rules: rulebook.Engine pivots-1.0.0+rules-1.1.0+candidates-1.0.0+fib-1.0.1+rank-1.2.0+setup-1.0.1 (computed on load), bars to Oct 20, 2026

Fibonacci map

Confluence zones above and below the closeClose 2.61

2.61close

Bar length is the zone's strength (a weighted count of relationships, not a probability). Select a zone to see what forms it.

2.36 – 2.41−8.6% from the close

3 relationships · strength 2.4 · Intermediate, Minor degrees

2.41RetracementCorrection retraces 50% of waves 1–5 · Minor · Basics · secondary ratio
2.39ProjectionWave C = 123.6% of wave A · Minor · EWF · secondary ratio
2.36ProjectionWave C = 161.8% of wave A · Intermediate · Essentials · secondary ratio

Method Targets come from the Fibonacci relationships the sources describe for the wave in progress, Elliott trend channels, the prior fourth wave of lesser degree, and 38.2–78.6% retracements of the latest swing. A zone is where two or more independent relationships fall within max(¼ ATR, 0.4%) of each other; strength counts them, weighting primary ratios and higher degrees. It is not a probability.

Evidence

The setup the preferred count implies, and how that kind of setup has done

Setup

Intermediate degree · from the preferred count

No scenario at intermediate degree right now

The target is closer than the stop (reward:risk 0.91 : 1): most of the count's expected move has already happened, so it isn't a setup. Viridia shows nothing rather than a guess.

Setups at other degrees:

NoteResearch scenario generated from Viridia's structural model. Not a recommendation.MethodA setup restates the preferred count as a trade: the entry (the close, or the level where the correction in progress most often ends), the stop where the count is wrong (a rule level, or the end of a finished pattern), and the count's own Fibonacci target. Reward:risk is measured from the middle of the entry range. A setup needs reward:risk of at least 1 : 1. It is research output from the wave count, not a recommendation or a forecast.

Engine details

Analysis engine: pivots-1.0.0+rules-1.1.0+candidates-1.0.0+fib-1.0.1+rank-1.2.0+setup-1.0.1
Bars analysed to: Oct 20, 2026
Price history: Automatic, updated nightly
Daily bars: 516 since Sep 30, 2024
Avg volume, 50 days: 2.33M
Dollar volume, 20 days: $6.7M
SEC CIK: 0001770450
Provider symbols: nasdaqtrader: XRX · massive: XRX
Listing changes: None since Sep 24, 2026

SourcePrices: Massive (end of day, split-adjusted). Listings: Nasdaq Trader, SECUpdatedOct 22, 2026, 8:00 AM EDTMethodSecurity master, daily snapshot diff

MethodStructure: the intermediate-degree swing structure (higher highs and lows, lower highs and lows, expanding or contracting). Wave: the preferred daily wave count's expected direction (constructive up, defensive down), unresolved when the alternate is within 5 points. Fibonacci: the nearest confluence zone of Fibonacci relationships and the distance to it (inside, or within 3%, counts as at a zone). Regime: price against its 50- and 200-day averages. Momentum: 3-month return and its lead over SPY (strong when both are positive and the lead is over 5 points; weak when both are negative). Risk: 20-day volatility against the 1-year level (elevated above 1.25×), and the 1-year drawdown and beta to SPY.

Structure at a glance

Daily chart, as of Oct 20, 2026

Since the count's last pivot (3.78, Jul 30, 2026) price has moved −31.0%, the way the count expects.12 of 12 rule-valid counts expect the current move to be down.Weekly count: zigzag complete ↑, opposite direction

Preferred count

Triangle up · complete, next move down ↓

A sideways triangle looks complete, so a thrust down would normally follow.

A-B-C-D-E from 1.55, Nov 20, 2025

Pattern Confidence67Medium

2 of 2 checks met

Key levels, preferred count

Reassess+44.8% from close

3.78

The pattern ended here. A move above it means its last wave is still going, so the pattern isn't complete.

Target, next move

None

No unreached Fibonacci target.

Nearest confluence zone−8.6% from close

2.36–2.41

3 Fibonacci relationships meet here.

Alternate count

Flat down · wave C ↓

Price is in wave C of a three-wave flat correction down.

A-B from 3.17, May 4, 2026

Pattern Confidence60Medium

1 of 1 checks met

Why this count is preferred · 2 met, 0 not met

Met

Alternate waves are related by a Fibonacci ratio within 5% (wave 5 to wave 1, C to A, or alternate triangle legs at 61.8%, or 161.8% in expanding triangles), the more reliable kind of relationship
The count starts at the price extreme of the prior swing (a new trend begins where the old one ended)

Not met

None.

MethodPattern Confidence = (guidelines met + 2) ÷ (guidelines measured + 4), from the rulebook's guidelines, Fibonacci tendencies and wave-personality checks (wave 3 speed and volume, wave 5 volume, alternation in time, a start at the prior extreme), alternate waves in Fibonacci ratio, and the rarity of running flats. The alternate is the best-ranked count that tells a different story. It ranks the rule-valid counts against each other; it is not a probability of any outcome.

What changed

Structural events, most recent first

Oct 16, 2026New leading countNew leading count: Zigzag complete ↓ (confidence 60).
Oct 16, 2026Count droppedZigzag wC ↑ is no longer among the leading counts; now Zigzag complete ↓.
Oct 16, 2026Daily/weekly alignmentDaily (down) and weekly (up) counts no longer agree.
Oct 16, 2026Swing confirmedA new intermediate swing high was confirmed.
Oct 16, 2026New Fib zoneA new Fibonacci confluence zone formed near 2.39.
Oct 9, 2026New Fib zoneA new Fibonacci confluence zone formed near 2.66.
Oct 8, 2026New Fib zoneA new Fibonacci confluence zone formed near 2.78.
Oct 6, 2026New Fib zoneA new Fibonacci confluence zone formed near 2.82.
Oct 2, 2026Trend changedTrend moved from uptrend to mixed.
Oct 1, 2026New Fib zoneA new Fibonacci confluence zone formed near 3.
Sep 28, 2026New Fib zoneA new Fibonacci confluence zone formed near 3.13.

Last swing high

3.78

Jul 30, 2026

Last swing low

2.51

Jul 23, 2026

Elliott Wave

Wave counts are built on these swings and each one passes every rule in the rulebook. They are ranked by how many guidelines they satisfy; the preferred and alternate counts are summarized above the chart.

MethodPrice versus its 50- and 200-day averages: above both with the 50 above the 200 is an uptrend, below both with the 50 below the 200 is a downtrend, anything else is mixed. Swings: adaptive ZigZag on daily bars, pivots-1.0.0+rules-1.1.0+candidates-1.0.0+fib-1.0.1+rank-1.2.0+setup-1.0.1.