TSLT

T-REX 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF

Cboe BZX · ETF

12.47

−0.58 (−4.44%)

Close, Oct 16, 2026

Watch

Structural summary

What is the structure, what changed, and what would invalidate it

Viridia Intelligence

Context across dimensions, not a rating

StructureLower highs, lower lowsIntermediate-degree swings on the daily chart.

WaveConstructiveImpulse, wave 4 up (Pattern Confidence 67); the weekly count agrees.

FibonacciZone belowNearest confluence 11.21–11.51 (2 relationships), −8.9% from the close.

MomentumWeak3 months −16.8% (behind SPY by 19.6 points); 6 months −35.6%.

RegimeDowntrend−5.1% vs the 50-day average, −29.6% vs the 200-day.

RiskNormal20-day volatility 63% vs 89% over the year; 1-year drawdown −70.6%; beta 4.39.

TSLT setup history3 resolved: 0 reached target first

Current structure

Price, swings and the preferred count on the chart

TSLT · 1DLoading bars…

SourceMassive, end of dayUpdated—MethodDaily bars, split-adjusted

Candidate interpretations

Every count shown passes every hard rule

Candidate interpretations

Ranked by Pattern Confidence

Counts ending at the latest intermediate swing low, 9.36 on Jul 29, 2026. 148 labelings tested, 113 broke a hard rule, 12+ remain.

Hard-rule evidence: why 113 labelings were eliminated

63Wave 2 always retraces less than 100% of wave 1
16Contracting triangle: C ends short of A's end, D short of B's end, and E short of C's end
12Wave 3 always travels beyond the end of wave 1
9Wave 4 always retraces less than 100% of wave 3
9Wave B ends short of the start of wave A (a zigzag is a sharp correction)
3Wave B retraces at least 90% of wave A

Method Every chain of 3–6 alternating pivots ending at the latest confirmed pivot is tested as each pattern; only counts with zero hard-rule failures are kept, then ranked by Pattern Confidence. Rules: rulebook.Engine pivots-1.0.0+rules-1.0.0+candidates-1.0.0+fib-1.0.1+rank-1.1.0+setup-1.0.1, bars to Oct 16, 2026

Fibonacci map

Confluence zones above and below the closeClose 12.47

12.47close

Bar length is the zone's strength (a weighted count of relationships, not a probability). Select a zone to see what forms it.

11.21 – 11.51−8.9% from the close

2 relationships · strength 1.6 · Minor degree

11.51RetracementMove after the correction retraces 61.8% of A–C · Minor · Viridia
11.21ProjectionWave C = 123.6% of wave A · Minor · EWF · secondary ratio

Method Targets come from the Fibonacci relationships the sources describe for the wave in progress, Elliott trend channels, the prior fourth wave of lesser degree, and 38.2–78.6% retracements of the latest swing. A zone is where two or more independent relationships fall within max(¼ ATR, 0.4%) of each other; strength counts them, weighting primary ratios and higher degrees. It is not a probability.

Evidence

The setup the preferred count implies, and how that kind of setup has done

Setup

Intermediate degree · from the preferred count

Bearish setupWaiting for the reference level

Wave 4 pullback

Wave 4 is correcting wave 3. The scenario looks for it to end ahead of wave 5.

Pattern Confidence 67 · Medium

Reference level+10.8% from close

13.82

Wave 4 retraces 38.2% of wave 3

Invalidation+23.4% from close

15.39

wave 4 cannot enter wave 1 territory (hard rule)

Structural target−60.6% from close

4.91

Wave 5 = wave 1, measured from the entry

Reward : risk

5.7 : 1

Invalidation 11.3% from the reference level · 2.0 ATR

Track record: this setup reached its target first in 7% of 109 past cases, averaging −0.29R. Method

Waiting: enter only if wave 4 reaches the entry range without crossing the stop.
The trade is wave 5: late in the trend, usually on lighter volume than wave 3.

NoteResearch scenario generated from Viridia's structural model. Not a recommendation.BasisIntermediate degree, daily bars through Oct 16, 2026. Followed for up to 60 sessions in the track record.MethodA setup restates the preferred count as a trade: the entry (the close, or the level where the correction in progress most often ends), the stop where the count is wrong (a rule level, or the end of a finished pattern), and the count's own Fibonacci target. Reward:risk is measured from the middle of the entry range. A setup needs reward:risk of at least 1 : 1. It is research output from the wave count, not a recommendation or a forecast.

Engine details

Analysis engine: pivots-1.0.0+rules-1.0.0+candidates-1.0.0+fib-1.0.1+rank-1.1.0+setup-1.0.1
Bars analysed to: Oct 16, 2026
Price history: Automatic, updated nightly
Daily bars: 514 since Sep 30, 2024
Avg volume, 50 days: 2.12M
Dollar volume, 20 days: $22.7M
SEC CIK: Not matched
Provider symbols: nasdaqtrader: TSLT · massive: TSLT
Listing changes: None since Sep 24, 2026

SourcePrices: Massive (end of day, split-adjusted). Listings: Nasdaq Trader, SECUpdatedOct 19, 2026, 8:00 AM EDTMethodSecurity master, daily snapshot diff

Structure at a glance

Daily chart, as of Oct 16, 2026

Since the count's last pivot (9.36, Jul 29, 2026) price has moved +33.2%, the way the count expects.12 of 12 rule-valid counts expect the current move to be up.Weekly count: ending diagonal wave 3 ↑, same direction

Preferred count

Impulse down · wave 4 ↑

Price is in wave 4 of a five-wave decline (impulse).

1-2-3 from 24.30, May 13, 2026

Pattern Confidence67Medium

4 of 5 checks met

Key levels, preferred count

Invalidation+23.4% from close

15.39

Price above this level breaks the count.

Target, wave 4+21.9% from close

15.20

Wave 4 retraces 50% of wave 3

Nearest confluence zone−8.9% from close

11.21–11.51

2 Fibonacci relationships meet here.

Alternate count

Zigzag down · complete, next move up ↑

A three-wave zigzag correction down looks complete, so the larger trend would normally resume up.

A-B-C from 33.03, Dec 22, 2025

Pattern Confidence60Medium

4 of 6 checks met

Why this count is preferred · 4 met, 1 not met

Met

Wave 2 retraces 50% to 85.4% of wave 1
The count starts at the price extreme of the prior swing (a new trend begins where the old one ended)
Wave 3 moves faster (price per bar) than waves 1 and 5
Wave 3 has the heaviest average volume of the actionary waves

Not met

Wave 3 measures 161.8% or more of wave 1

MethodPattern Confidence = (guidelines met + 2) ÷ (guidelines measured + 4), from the rulebook's guidelines, Fibonacci tendencies and wave-personality checks (wave 3 speed and volume, wave 5 volume, alternation in time, a start at the prior extreme), alternate waves in Fibonacci ratio, and the rarity of running flats. The alternate is the best-ranked count that tells a different story. It ranks the rule-valid counts against each other; it is not a probability of any outcome.

Structural summary

Viridia Intelligence

Current structure

Candidate interpretations

Candidate interpretations

Fibonacci map

Fibonacci map

Evidence

Setup

Engine details

Structure at a glance

What changed