LIFE

Ethos Technologies Inc. Class A

NASDAQ · Common stock

37.52

−1.24 (−3.20%)

Close, Oct 16, 2026

Watch

Structural summary

What is the structure, what changed, and what would invalidate it

Viridia Intelligence

Context across dimensions, not a rating

StructureHigher highs, higher lowsIntermediate-degree swings on the daily chart.

WaveUnresolvedEnding diagonal, wave 3 up (Pattern Confidence 60); the weekly count agrees.

FibonacciZone aboveNearest confluence 42.55–43.6 (4 relationships), +14.8% from the close.

MomentumStrong3 months +102.8% (ahead of SPY by 100.0 points); 6 months +131.6%.

RegimeNot enough historyNeeds 200 sessions.

RiskNormal20-day volatility 53% vs 91% over the year; 1-year drawdown −50.1%; beta 1.78.

LIFE setup historyNot replayed yet; the track record fills in most-traded securities first.

Current structure

Price, swings and the preferred count on the chart

LIFE · 1DLoading bars…

SourceMassive, end of dayUpdated—MethodDaily bars, split-adjusted

Candidate interpretations

Every count shown passes every hard rule

Candidate interpretations

Ranked by Pattern Confidence

Counts ending at the latest intermediate swing low, 31.26 on Oct 1, 2026. 32 labelings tested, 18 broke a hard rule, 12+ remain.

Hard-rule evidence: why 18 labelings were eliminated

9Wave 2 always retraces less than 100% of wave 1
2Contracting diagonal: wave 3 is shorter than wave 1, wave 5 shorter than wave 3, and wave 4 shorter than wave 2
2Wave B retraces at least 90% of wave A
2Contracting triangle: C ends short of A's end, D short of B's end, and E short of C's end
2Wave B ends short of the start of wave A (a zigzag is a sharp correction)
1Wave 4 does not enter the price territory of wave 1

Method Every chain of 3–6 alternating pivots ending at the latest confirmed pivot is tested as each pattern; only counts with zero hard-rule failures are kept, then ranked by Pattern Confidence. Rules: rulebook.Engine pivots-1.0.0+rules-1.0.0+candidates-1.0.0+fib-1.0.1+rank-1.1.0+setup-1.0.1, bars to Oct 16, 2026

Fibonacci map

Confluence zones above and below the closeClose 37.52

37.52close

Bar length is the zone's strength (a weighted count of relationships, not a probability). Select a zone to see what forms it.

42.55 – 43.60+14.8% from the close

4 relationships · strength 4.2 · Primary, Intermediate, Minor degrees

43.60ProjectionWave C = 123.6% of wave A · Primary · EWF · secondary ratio
43.52RetracementMove after the correction retraces 100% of A–C · Intermediate · Viridia · secondary ratio
42.75ProjectionWave C = 61.8% of wave A · Minor · Essentials · secondary ratio
42.55RetracementMove after the correction retraces 100% of A–C · Minor · Viridia · secondary ratio

Method Targets come from the Fibonacci relationships the sources describe for the wave in progress, Elliott trend channels, the prior fourth wave of lesser degree, and 38.2–78.6% retracements of the latest swing. A zone is where two or more independent relationships fall within max(¼ ATR, 0.4%) of each other; strength counts them, weighting primary ratios and higher degrees. It is not a probability.

Evidence

The setup the preferred count implies, and how that kind of setup has done

Setup

Intermediate degree · from the preferred count

No scenario at intermediate degree right now

The target is closer than the stop (reward:risk 0.96 : 1): most of the count's expected move has already happened, so it isn't a setup. Viridia shows nothing rather than a guess.

NoteResearch scenario generated from Viridia's structural model. Not a recommendation.MethodA setup restates the preferred count as a trade: the entry (the close, or the level where the correction in progress most often ends), the stop where the count is wrong (a rule level, or the end of a finished pattern), and the count's own Fibonacci target. Reward:risk is measured from the middle of the entry range. A setup needs reward:risk of at least 1 : 1. It is research output from the wave count, not a recommendation or a forecast.

Engine details

Analysis engine: pivots-1.0.0+rules-1.0.0+candidates-1.0.0+fib-1.0.1+rank-1.1.0+setup-1.0.1
Bars analysed to: Oct 16, 2026
Price history: Automatic, updated nightly
Daily bars: 181 since Jan 29, 2026
Avg volume, 50 days: 1.50M
Dollar volume, 20 days: $51.4M
SEC CIK: 0001788451
Provider symbols: nasdaqtrader: LIFE · massive: LIFE
Listing changes: None since Sep 24, 2026

SourcePrices: Massive (end of day, split-adjusted). Listings: Nasdaq Trader, SECUpdatedOct 21, 2026, 8:00 AM EDTMethodSecurity master, daily snapshot diff

MethodStructure: the intermediate-degree swing structure (higher highs and lows, lower highs and lows, expanding or contracting). Wave: the preferred daily wave count's expected direction (constructive up, defensive down), unresolved when the alternate is within 5 points. Fibonacci: the nearest confluence zone of Fibonacci relationships and the distance to it (inside, or within 3%, counts as at a zone). Regime: price against its 50- and 200-day averages. Momentum: 3-month return and its lead over SPY (strong when both are positive and the lead is over 5 points; weak when both are negative). Risk: 20-day volatility against the 1-year level (elevated above 1.25×), and the 1-year drawdown and beta to SPY.

Structure at a glance

Daily chart, as of Oct 16, 2026

Since the count's last pivot (31.26, Oct 1, 2026) price has moved +20.0%, the way the count expects.12 of 12 rule-valid counts expect the current move to be up.Weekly count: zigzag wave C ↑, same direction

Close call.The top two counts are within 3 points. Treat the structure as unresolved until one is invalidated.

Preferred count

Ending diagonal up · wave 3 ↑

Price is in wave 3 of a five-wave advance (ending diagonal).

1-2 from 9.45, Feb 12, 2026

Pattern Confidence60Medium

1 of 1 checks met

Key levels, preferred count

Invalidation−74.8% from close

9.45

Price below this level breaks the count.

Target, wave 3+71.5% from close

64.36

Wave 3 = 100% of wave 1

Nearest confluence zone+14.8% from close

42.55–43.60

4 Fibonacci relationships meet here.

Alternate count

Zigzag up · wave C ↑

Price is in wave C of a three-wave zigzag correction up.

A-B from 9.45, Feb 12, 2026

Pattern Confidence57Low

2 of 3 checks met

Why this count is preferred · 1 met, 0 not met

Met

The count starts at the price extreme of the prior swing (a new trend begins where the old one ended)

Not met

None.

MethodPattern Confidence = (guidelines met + 2) ÷ (guidelines measured + 4), from the rulebook's guidelines, Fibonacci tendencies and wave-personality checks (wave 3 speed and volume, wave 5 volume, alternation in time, a start at the prior extreme), alternate waves in Fibonacci ratio, and the rarity of running flats. The alternate is the best-ranked count that tells a different story. It ranks the rule-valid counts against each other; it is not a probability of any outcome.

What changed

Structural events, most recent first

Oct 12, 2026Daily/weekly alignmentDaily and weekly counts now both point up.
Oct 12, 2026New Fib zoneA new Fibonacci confluence zone formed near 38.82.
Oct 9, 2026New leading countNew leading count: Ending Diagonal w3 ↑ (confidence 60).
Oct 9, 2026Count droppedZigzag complete ↓ is no longer among the leading counts; now Ending Diagonal w3 ↑.
Oct 9, 2026Daily/weekly alignmentDaily (up) and weekly (down) counts no longer agree.
Oct 9, 2026Swing confirmedA new intermediate swing low was confirmed.
Oct 8, 2026New Fib zoneA new Fibonacci confluence zone formed near 37.26.
Oct 5, 2026New Fib zoneA new Fibonacci confluence zone formed near 37.26.
Sep 28, 2026New leading countNew leading count: Zigzag complete ↓ (confidence 70).
Sep 28, 2026Count droppedZigzag wC ↑ is no longer among the leading counts; now Zigzag complete ↓.
Sep 28, 2026Daily/weekly alignmentDaily and weekly counts now both point down.
Sep 28, 2026Swing confirmedA new intermediate swing high was confirmed.

Last swing high

42.55

Sep 8, 2026

Last swing low

31.26

Oct 1, 2026

Elliott Wave

Wave counts are built on these swings and each one passes every rule in the rulebook. They are ranked by how many guidelines they satisfy; the preferred and alternate counts are summarized above the chart.

MethodPrice versus its 50- and 200-day averages: above both with the 50 above the 200 is an uptrend, below both with the 50 below the 200 is a downtrend, anything else is mixed. Swings: adaptive ZigZag on daily bars, pivots-1.0.0+rules-1.0.0+candidates-1.0.0+fib-1.0.1+rank-1.1.0+setup-1.0.1.