LFTO

Liftoff Mobile, Inc.

NASDAQ · Common stock

16.51

−0.43 (−2.54%)

Close, Oct 16, 2026

Watch

Structural summary

What is the structure, what changed, and what would invalidate it

Viridia Intelligence

Context across dimensions, not a rating

StructureLower highs, lower lowsIntermediate-degree swings on the daily chart.

WaveUnresolvedImpulse, wave 4 up (Pattern Confidence 63); the weekly count points the other way.

FibonacciZone aboveNearest confluence 17.73–18.15 (5 relationships), +8.7% from the close.

MomentumWeak3 months −28.7% (behind SPY by 31.6 points).

RegimeNot enough historyNeeds 200 sessions.

RiskNormal20-day volatility 57% vs 74% over the year; 1-year drawdown −46.7%; beta 1.03.

LFTO setup historyNot replayed yet; the track record fills in most-traded securities first.

Current structure

Price, swings and the preferred count on the chart

LFTO · 1DLoading bars…

SourceMassive, end of dayUpdated—MethodDaily bars, split-adjusted

Candidate interpretations

Every count shown passes every hard rule

Candidate interpretations

Ranked by Pattern Confidence

Counts ending at the latest intermediate swing low, 15.02 on Oct 5, 2026. 12 labelings tested, 5 broke a hard rule, 7 remain.

Hard-rule evidence: why 5 labelings were eliminated

3Wave 2 always retraces less than 100% of wave 1
1Wave B retraces at least 90% of wave A
1Wave B ends short of the start of wave A (a zigzag is a sharp correction)

Method Every chain of 3–6 alternating pivots ending at the latest confirmed pivot is tested as each pattern; only counts with zero hard-rule failures are kept, then ranked by Pattern Confidence. Rules: rulebook.Engine pivots-1.0.0+rules-1.0.0+candidates-1.0.0+fib-1.0.1+rank-1.1.0+setup-1.0.1, bars to Oct 16, 2026

Fibonacci map

Confluence zones above and below the closeClose 16.51

16.51close

Bar length is the zone's strength (a weighted count of relationships, not a probability). Select a zone to see what forms it.

17.73 – 18.15+8.7% from the close

5 relationships · strength 6.4 · Intermediate, Minor degrees

18.15ProjectionWave D = 61.8% of wave B · Intermediate · Essentials
18.07RetracementWave 4 retraces 23.6% of wave 3 · Minor · EWF · secondary ratio
18.00Prior 4thWave 4 near the prior fourth wave of lesser degree (2026-09-21) · Intermediate · Essentials
17.98ProjectionWave C = 161.8% of wave A · Minor · Essentials · secondary ratio
17.73RetracementWave 4 retraces 23.6% of wave 3 · Intermediate · EWF · secondary ratio

Method Targets come from the Fibonacci relationships the sources describe for the wave in progress, Elliott trend channels, the prior fourth wave of lesser degree, and 38.2–78.6% retracements of the latest swing. A zone is where two or more independent relationships fall within max(¼ ATR, 0.4%) of each other; strength counts them, weighting primary ratios and higher degrees. It is not a probability.

Evidence

The setup the preferred count implies, and how that kind of setup has done

Setup

Intermediate degree · from the preferred count

Bearish setupWaiting for the reference level

Wave 4 pullback

Wave 4 is correcting wave 3. The scenario looks for it to end ahead of wave 5.

Pattern Confidence 63 · Medium

Reference level+18.0% from close

19.41–19.54

Wave 4 retraces 38.2% of wave 3, inside a confluence zone (2 relationships)

Invalidation+29.8% from close

21.43

wave 4 cannot enter wave 1 territory (hard rule)

Structural target−34.5% from close

10.81

Wave 5 = wave 1, measured from the entry

Reward : risk

4.4 : 1

Invalidation 10.0% from the reference level · 2.5 ATR

Track record: this setup reached its target first in 7% of 109 past cases, averaging −0.29R. Method

Waiting: enter only if wave 4 reaches the entry range without crossing the stop.
The trade is wave 5: late in the trend, usually on lighter volume than wave 3.
Close call: the alternate count scores within a few points of the preferred one.

NoteResearch scenario generated from Viridia's structural model. Not a recommendation.BasisIntermediate degree, daily bars through Oct 16, 2026. Followed for up to 60 sessions in the track record.MethodA setup restates the preferred count as a trade: the entry (the close, or the level where the correction in progress most often ends), the stop where the count is wrong (a rule level, or the end of a finished pattern), and the count's own Fibonacci target. Reward:risk is measured from the middle of the entry range. A setup needs reward:risk of at least 1 : 1. It is research output from the wave count, not a recommendation or a forecast.

Engine details

Analysis engine: pivots-1.0.0+rules-1.0.0+candidates-1.0.0+fib-1.0.1+rank-1.1.0+setup-1.0.1
Bars analysed to: Oct 16, 2026
Price history: Automatic, updated nightly
Daily bars: 94 since Jun 4, 2026
Avg volume, 50 days: 875.2K
Dollar volume, 20 days: $11.0M
SEC CIK: 0001850351
Provider symbols: nasdaqtrader: LFTO · massive: LFTO
Listing changes: None since Sep 24, 2026

SourcePrices: Massive (end of day, split-adjusted). Listings: Nasdaq Trader, SECUpdatedOct 19, 2026, 8:00 AM EDTMethodSecurity master, daily snapshot diff

Structure at a glance

Daily chart, as of Oct 16, 2026

Since the count's last pivot (15.02, Oct 5, 2026) price has moved +9.9%, the way the count expects.7 of 7 rule-valid counts expect the current move to be up.Weekly count: zigzag wave C ↓, opposite direction

Close call.The top two counts are within 3 points. Treat the structure as unresolved until one is invalidated.

Preferred count

Impulse down · wave 4 ↑

Price is in wave 4 of a five-wave decline (impulse).

1-2-3 from 30.10, Jun 5, 2026

Pattern Confidence63Medium

3 of 4 checks met

Key levels, preferred count

Invalidation+29.8% from close

21.43

Price above this level breaks the count.

Target, wave 4+9.0% from close

18.00

Wave 4 near the prior fourth wave of lesser degree (2026-09-21)

Nearest confluence zone+8.7% from close

17.73–18.15

5 Fibonacci relationships meet here.

Alternate count

Flat up · wave C ↑

Price is in wave C of a three-wave flat correction up.

A-B from 21.43, Jul 29, 2026

Pattern Confidence60Medium

1 of 1 checks met

Why this count is preferred · 3 met, 1 not met

Met

Wave 2 retraces 50% to 85.4% of wave 1
Wave 3 moves faster (price per bar) than waves 1 and 5
Wave 3 has the heaviest average volume of the actionary waves

Not met

Wave 3 measures 161.8% or more of wave 1

MethodPattern Confidence = (guidelines met + 2) ÷ (guidelines measured + 4), from the rulebook's guidelines, Fibonacci tendencies and wave-personality checks (wave 3 speed and volume, wave 5 volume, alternation in time, a start at the prior extreme), alternate waves in Fibonacci ratio, and the rarity of running flats. The alternate is the best-ranked count that tells a different story. It ranks the rule-valid counts against each other; it is not a probability of any outcome.

Structural summary

Viridia Intelligence

Current structure

Candidate interpretations

Candidate interpretations

Fibonacci map

Fibonacci map

Evidence

Setup

Engine details

Structure at a glance

What changed