IONL

GraniteShares 2x Long IONQ Daily ETF

NASDAQ · ETF

7.30

+0.21 (+2.96%)

Close, Oct 20, 2026

Watch

Structural summary

What is the structure, what changed, and what would invalidate it

Viridia Intelligence

Context across dimensions, not a rating

StructureContracting rangeIntermediate-degree swings on the daily chart.

WaveUnresolvedZigzag, wave C down (Pattern Confidence 57); the weekly count agrees.

FibonacciNo zoneNo confluence zone near price.

MomentumWeak3 months −33.6% (behind SPY by 36.5 points); 6 months −71.5%.

RegimeDowntrend−44.9% vs the 50-day average, −65.5% vs the 200-day.

RiskNormal20-day volatility 153% vs 183% over the year; 1-year drawdown −91.2%; beta 7.06.

IONL setup historyNot replayed yet; the track record fills in most-traded securities first.

Current structure

Price, swings and the preferred count on the chart

IONL · 1DLoading bars…

SourceMassive, end of dayUpdated—MethodDaily bars, split-adjusted

Candidate interpretations

Every count shown passes every hard rule

Candidate interpretations

Ranked by Pattern Confidence

Counts ending at the latest intermediate swing high, 18.02 on Sep 28, 2026. 20 labelings tested, 12 broke a hard rule, 8 remain.

Hard-rule evidence: why 12 labelings were eliminated

9Wave 3 always travels beyond the end of wave 1
2Price after the last labeled point has not crossed a rule-based invalidation level
1Wave B retraces at least 90% of wave A

Method Every chain of 3–6 alternating pivots ending at the latest confirmed pivot is tested as each pattern; only counts with zero hard-rule failures are kept, then ranked by Pattern Confidence. Rules: rulebook.Engine pivots-1.0.0+rules-1.0.0+candidates-1.0.0+fib-1.0.1+rank-1.1.0+setup-1.0.1, bars to Oct 20, 2026

Fibonacci map

Confluence zones above and below the closeClose 7.30

No price band within 35% of the close has two or more independent Fibonacci relationships.

Method Targets come from the Fibonacci relationships the sources describe for the wave in progress, Elliott trend channels, the prior fourth wave of lesser degree, and 38.2–78.6% retracements of the latest swing. A zone is where two or more independent relationships fall within max(¼ ATR, 0.4%) of each other; strength counts them, weighting primary ratios and higher degrees. It is not a probability.

Evidence

The setup the preferred count implies, and how that kind of setup has done

Setup

Intermediate degree · from the preferred count

No scenario at intermediate degree right now

The target is closer than the stop (reward:risk 0.39 : 1): most of the count's expected move has already happened, so it isn't a setup. Viridia shows nothing rather than a guess.

NoteResearch scenario generated from Viridia's structural model. Not a recommendation.MethodA setup restates the preferred count as a trade: the entry (the close, or the level where the correction in progress most often ends), the stop where the count is wrong (a rule level, or the end of a finished pattern), and the count's own Fibonacci target. Reward:risk is measured from the middle of the entry range. A setup needs reward:risk of at least 1 : 1. It is research output from the wave count, not a recommendation or a forecast.

Engine details

Analysis engine: pivots-1.0.0+rules-1.0.0+candidates-1.0.0+fib-1.0.1+rank-1.1.0+setup-1.0.1
Bars analysed to: Oct 20, 2026
Price history: Automatic, updated nightly
Daily bars: 396 since Mar 25, 2025
Avg volume, 50 days: 772.8K
Dollar volume, 20 days: $13.0M
SEC CIK: Not matched
Provider symbols: nasdaqtrader: IONL · massive: IONL
Listing changes: None since Sep 24, 2026

SourcePrices: Massive (end of day, split-adjusted). Listings: Nasdaq Trader, SECUpdatedOct 21, 2026, 8:00 AM EDTMethodSecurity master, daily snapshot diff

MethodStructure: the intermediate-degree swing structure (higher highs and lows, lower highs and lows, expanding or contracting). Wave: the preferred daily wave count's expected direction (constructive up, defensive down), unresolved when the alternate is within 5 points. Fibonacci: the nearest confluence zone of Fibonacci relationships and the distance to it (inside, or within 3%, counts as at a zone). Regime: price against its 50- and 200-day averages. Momentum: 3-month return and its lead over SPY (strong when both are positive and the lead is over 5 points; weak when both are negative). Risk: 20-day volatility against the 1-year level (elevated above 1.25×), and the 1-year drawdown and beta to SPY.

Structure at a glance

Daily chart, as of Oct 20, 2026

Since the count's last pivot (18.02, Sep 28, 2026) price has moved −59.5%, the way the count expects.8 of 8 rule-valid counts expect the current move to be down.Weekly count: ending diagonal wave 3 ↓, same direction

Close call.The top two counts are within 1 points. Treat the structure as unresolved until one is invalidated.

Preferred count

Zigzag down · wave C ↓

Price is in wave C of a three-wave zigzag correction down.

A-B from 19.56, Aug 13, 2026

Pattern Confidence57Low

2 of 3 checks met

Key levels, preferred count

Invalidation+167.9% from close

19.56

Price above this level breaks the count.

Target, wave C−65.7% from close

2.50

Wave C = 161.8% of wave A

Nearest confluence zone

None

No zone within 35% of price.

Alternate count

Flat up · complete, next move down ↓

A three-wave flat correction up looks complete, so the larger trend would normally resume down.

A-B-C from 9.05, Jul 29, 2026

Pattern Confidence56Low

3 of 5 checks met

Why this count is preferred · 2 met, 1 not met

Met

Wave B retraces 38.2% to 85.4% of wave A
Wave B retraces under 90% of wave A (deeper B waves fit a flat better)

Not met

The count starts at the price extreme of the prior swing (a new trend begins where the old one ended)

MethodPattern Confidence = (guidelines met + 2) ÷ (guidelines measured + 4), from the rulebook's guidelines, Fibonacci tendencies and wave-personality checks (wave 3 speed and volume, wave 5 volume, alternation in time, a start at the prior extreme), alternate waves in Fibonacci ratio, and the rarity of running flats. The alternate is the best-ranked count that tells a different story. It ranks the rule-valid counts against each other; it is not a probability of any outcome.

What changed

Structural events, most recent first

Oct 20, 2026Daily/weekly alignmentDaily and weekly counts now both point down.
Oct 12, 2026New leading countNew leading count: Zigzag wC ↓ (confidence 57).
Oct 12, 2026Count droppedEnding Diagonal w3 ↑ is no longer among the leading counts; now Zigzag wC ↓.
Oct 12, 2026Daily/weekly alignmentDaily (down) and weekly (up) counts no longer agree.
Oct 12, 2026Swing confirmedA new intermediate swing high was confirmed.
Oct 7, 2026Trend changedTrend moved from mixed to downtrend.

Last swing high

18.02

Sep 28, 2026

Last swing low

9.97

Sep 14, 2026

Elliott Wave

Wave counts are built on these swings and each one passes every rule in the rulebook. They are ranked by how many guidelines they satisfy; the preferred and alternate counts are summarized above the chart.

MethodPrice versus its 50- and 200-day averages: above both with the 50 above the 200 is an uptrend, below both with the 50 below the 200 is a downtrend, anything else is mixed. Swings: adaptive ZigZag on daily bars, pivots-1.0.0+rules-1.0.0+candidates-1.0.0+fib-1.0.1+rank-1.1.0+setup-1.0.1.