GTM

ZoomInfo Technologies Inc.

NASDAQ · Common stock

3.80

−0.28 (−6.86%)

Close, Oct 16, 2026

Watch

Structural summary

What is the structure, what changed, and what would invalidate it

Viridia Intelligence

Context across dimensions, not a rating

StructureContracting rangeIntermediate-degree swings on the daily chart.

WaveUnresolvedImpulse complete, next move up (Pattern Confidence 71); the weekly count agrees.

FibonacciZone aboveNearest confluence 4.34–4.37 (3 relationships), +14.5% from the close.

MomentumStrong3 months +21.4% (ahead of SPY by 18.6 points); 6 months −38.8%.

RegimeDowntrend−3.2% vs the 50-day average, −25.2% vs the 200-day.

RiskNormal20-day volatility 48% vs 68% over the year; 1-year drawdown −77.9%; beta 0.97.

GTM setup historyNot replayed yet; the track record fills in most-traded securities first.

Current structure

Price, swings and the preferred count on the chart

GTM · 1DLoading bars…

SourceMassive, end of dayUpdated—MethodDaily bars, split-adjusted

Candidate interpretations

Every count shown passes every hard rule

Candidate interpretations

Ranked by Pattern Confidence

Counts ending at the latest intermediate swing low, 3.50 on Sep 28, 2026. 74 labelings tested, 51 broke a hard rule, 12+ remain.

Hard-rule evidence: why 51 labelings were eliminated

15Wave 2 always retraces less than 100% of wave 1
12Contracting diagonal: wave 3 is shorter than wave 1, wave 5 shorter than wave 3, and wave 4 shorter than wave 2
12Wave 3 always travels beyond the end of wave 1
7Contracting triangle: C ends short of A's end, D short of B's end, and E short of C's end
5Wave B retraces at least 90% of wave A

Method Every chain of 3–6 alternating pivots ending at the latest confirmed pivot is tested as each pattern; only counts with zero hard-rule failures are kept, then ranked by Pattern Confidence. Rules: rulebook.Engine pivots-1.0.0+rules-1.0.0+candidates-1.0.0+fib-1.0.1+rank-1.1.0+setup-1.0.1, bars to Oct 16, 2026

Fibonacci map

Confluence zones above and below the closeClose 3.80

3.80close

Bar length is the zone's strength (a weighted count of relationships, not a probability). Select a zone to see what forms it.

4.34 – 4.37+14.5% from the close

3 relationships · strength 3.6 · Intermediate, Minor degrees

4.37Prior 4thCorrection ends near the end of wave 4 · Intermediate · Essentials
4.37RetracementMove after the correction retraces 100% of A–C · Minor · Viridia · secondary ratio
4.34ProjectionWave C = 161.8% of wave A · Minor · Essentials

Method Targets come from the Fibonacci relationships the sources describe for the wave in progress, Elliott trend channels, the prior fourth wave of lesser degree, and 38.2–78.6% retracements of the latest swing. A zone is where two or more independent relationships fall within max(¼ ATR, 0.4%) of each other; strength counts them, weighting primary ratios and higher degrees. It is not a probability.

Evidence

The setup the preferred count implies, and how that kind of setup has done

Setup

Intermediate degree · from the preferred count

Bullish setupActive now

Five waves complete

Five waves look complete, so a correction in the other direction would normally follow.

Pattern Confidence 71 · High

Reference level0.0% from close

3.80

Latest close

Invalidation−7.9% from close

3.50

End of wave 5: beyond it wave 5 is still extending

Structural target+14.9% from close

4.37

End of wave 4: corrections tend to end near it

Reward : risk

1.9 : 1

Invalidation 7.9% from the reference level · 1.5 ATR

Track record: this setup reached its target first in 28% of 457 past cases, averaging +0.13R. It made money in both halves of the replay (+0.12R, then +0.13R). Method

Counter-trend trade against the five-wave move just finished.
Close call: the alternate count scores within a few points of the preferred one.

NoteResearch scenario generated from Viridia's structural model. Not a recommendation.BasisIntermediate degree, daily bars through Oct 16, 2026. Followed for up to 60 sessions in the track record.MethodA setup restates the preferred count as a trade: the entry (the close, or the level where the correction in progress most often ends), the stop where the count is wrong (a rule level, or the end of a finished pattern), and the count's own Fibonacci target. Reward:risk is measured from the middle of the entry range. A setup needs reward:risk of at least 1 : 1. It is research output from the wave count, not a recommendation or a forecast.

Engine details

Analysis engine: pivots-1.0.0+rules-1.0.0+candidates-1.0.0+fib-1.0.1+rank-1.1.0+setup-1.0.1
Bars analysed to: Oct 16, 2026
Price history: Automatic, updated nightly
Daily bars: 360 since May 13, 2025
Avg volume, 50 days: 5.51M
Dollar volume, 20 days: $18.3M
SEC CIK: 0001794515
Provider symbols: nasdaqtrader: GTM · massive: GTM
Listing changes: None since Sep 24, 2026

SourcePrices: Massive (end of day, split-adjusted). Listings: Nasdaq Trader, SECUpdatedOct 19, 2026, 8:00 AM EDTMethodSecurity master, daily snapshot diff

Structure at a glance

Daily chart, as of Oct 16, 2026

Since the count's last pivot (3.50, Sep 28, 2026) price has moved +8.6%, the way the count expects.12 of 12 rule-valid counts expect the current move to be up.Weekly count: flat wave C ↑, same direction

Close call.The top two counts are within 0 points. Treat the structure as unresolved until one is invalidated.

Preferred count

Impulse down · complete, next move up ↑

A five-wave decline (impulse) looks complete, so a correction up would normally follow.

1-2-3-4-5 from 12.51, Sep 15, 2025

Pattern Confidence71High

10 of 13 checks met

Key levels, preferred count

Reassess−7.9% from close

3.50

The pattern ended here. A move below it means its last wave is still going, so the pattern isn't complete.

Target, next move+14.9% from close

4.37

Correction ends near the end of wave 4

Nearest confluence zone+14.5% from close

4.34–4.37

3 Fibonacci relationships meet here.

Alternate count

Zigzag up · wave C ↑

Price is in wave C of a three-wave zigzag correction up.

A-B from 2.54, Jun 22, 2026

Pattern Confidence71High

3 of 3 checks met

Why this count is preferred · 10 met, 3 not met

Met

Wave 2 retraces 50% to 85.4% of wave 1
Wave 3 measures 161.8% or more of wave 1
Wave 4 retraces 14.6% to 38.2% of wave 3, and no more than 50%
Waves 2 and 4 alternate: one sharp and deep, the other shallow or sideways
One actionary wave (1, 3 or 5) is extended, most often wave 3 in stocks
The count starts at the price extreme of the prior swing (a new trend begins where the old one ended)
Wave 3 moves faster (price per bar) than waves 1 and 5
Wave 3 has the heaviest average volume of the actionary waves
Wave 5 comes on lighter average volume than wave 3
Waves 2 and 4 alternate in time too: the shallower correction takes at least as long

Not met

When wave 3 is extended, waves 1 and 5 tend toward equality
Wave 5 exceeds the end of wave 3 (a failure is called a truncation)
Alternate waves are related by a Fibonacci ratio within 5% (wave 5 to wave 1, C to A, or triangle legs at 61.8%), the more reliable kind of relationship

MethodPattern Confidence = (guidelines met + 2) ÷ (guidelines measured + 4), from the rulebook's guidelines, Fibonacci tendencies and wave-personality checks (wave 3 speed and volume, wave 5 volume, alternation in time, a start at the prior extreme), alternate waves in Fibonacci ratio, and the rarity of running flats. The alternate is the best-ranked count that tells a different story. It ranks the rule-valid counts against each other; it is not a probability of any outcome.

Structural summary

Viridia Intelligence

Current structure

Candidate interpretations

Candidate interpretations

Fibonacci map

Fibonacci map

Evidence

Setup

Engine details

Structure at a glance

What changed