DLLL

GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF

NASDAQ · ETF

22.16

−2.31 (−9.44%)

Close, Oct 16, 2026

Watch

Structural summary

What is the structure, what changed, and what would invalidate it

Viridia Intelligence

Context across dimensions, not a rating

StructureLower highs, lower lowsIntermediate-degree swings on the daily chart.

WaveUnresolvedZigzag, wave C up (Pattern Confidence 71); the weekly count agrees.

FibonacciNo zoneNo confluence zone near price.

MomentumStrong3 months +17.9% (ahead of SPY by 15.1 points); 6 months +261.3%.

RegimeMixed−27.8% vs the 50-day average, +40.6% vs the 200-day.

RiskNormal20-day volatility 122% vs 151% over the year; 1-year drawdown −57.1%; beta 4.68.

DLLL setup history2 resolved: 0 reached target first, average −0.16R

Current structure

Price, swings and the preferred count on the chart

DLLL · 1DLoading bars…

SourceMassive, end of dayUpdated—MethodDaily bars, split-adjusted

Candidate interpretations

Every count shown passes every hard rule

Candidate interpretations

Ranked by Pattern Confidence

Counts ending at the latest intermediate swing low, 15.87 on Jul 28, 2026. 116 labelings tested, 95 broke a hard rule, 12+ remain.

Hard-rule evidence: why 95 labelings were eliminated

48Wave 2 always retraces less than 100% of wave 1
11Contracting triangle: C ends short of A's end, D short of B's end, and E short of C's end
9Wave 4 always retraces less than 100% of wave 3
7Price after the last labeled point has not crossed a rule-based invalidation level
6Wave 3 always travels beyond the end of wave 1
6Expanding triangle: C ends beyond A's end, D beyond B's end, and E beyond C's end

Method Every chain of 3–6 alternating pivots ending at the latest confirmed pivot is tested as each pattern; only counts with zero hard-rule failures are kept, then ranked by Pattern Confidence. Rules: rulebook.Engine pivots-1.0.0+rules-1.0.0+candidates-1.0.0+fib-1.0.1+rank-1.1.0+setup-1.0.1, bars to Oct 16, 2026

Fibonacci map

Confluence zones above and below the closeClose 22.16

No price band within 35% of the close has two or more independent Fibonacci relationships.

Method Targets come from the Fibonacci relationships the sources describe for the wave in progress, Elliott trend channels, the prior fourth wave of lesser degree, and 38.2–78.6% retracements of the latest swing. A zone is where two or more independent relationships fall within max(¼ ATR, 0.4%) of each other; strength counts them, weighting primary ratios and higher degrees. It is not a probability.

Evidence

The setup the preferred count implies, and how that kind of setup has done

Setup

Intermediate degree · from the preferred count

The intermediate-degree scenario was held back

Its levels didn't pass Viridia's checks: invalidation over 25% away; target over 100% or 25 ATR away. It's listed for review instead of shown.

NoteResearch scenario generated from Viridia's structural model. Not a recommendation.MethodA setup restates the preferred count as a trade: the entry (the close, or the level where the correction in progress most often ends), the stop where the count is wrong (a rule level, or the end of a finished pattern), and the count's own Fibonacci target. Reward:risk is measured from the middle of the entry range. A setup needs reward:risk of at least 1 : 1. It is research output from the wave count, not a recommendation or a forecast.

Engine details

Analysis engine: pivots-1.0.0+rules-1.0.0+candidates-1.0.0+fib-1.0.1+rank-1.1.0+setup-1.0.1
Bars analysed to: Oct 16, 2026
Price history: Automatic, updated nightly
Daily bars: 421 since Feb 13, 2025
Avg volume, 50 days: 1.94M
Dollar volume, 20 days: $54.6M
SEC CIK: Not matched
Provider symbols: nasdaqtrader: DLLL · massive: DLLL
Listing changes: None since Sep 24, 2026

SourcePrices: Massive (end of day, split-adjusted). Listings: Nasdaq Trader, SECUpdatedOct 20, 2026, 8:00 AM EDTMethodSecurity master, daily snapshot diff

Structure at a glance

Daily chart, as of Oct 16, 2026

Since the count's last pivot (15.87, Jul 28, 2026) price has moved +39.7%, the way the count expects.12 of 12 rule-valid counts expect the current move to be up.Weekly count: zigzag wave C ↑, same direction

Close call.The top two counts are within 4 points. Treat the structure as unresolved until one is invalidated.

Preferred count

Zigzag up · wave C ↑

Price is in wave C of a three-wave zigzag correction up.

A-B from 2.17, Feb 12, 2026

Pattern Confidence71High

3 of 3 checks met

Key levels, preferred count

Invalidation−90.2% from close

2.17

Price below this level breaks the count.

Target, wave C+100.0% from close

44.32

Wave C = 100% of wave A

Nearest confluence zone

None

No zone within 35% of price.

Alternate count

Impulse up · wave 3 ↑

Price is in wave 3 of a five-wave advance (impulse).

1-2 from 2.17, Feb 12, 2026

Pattern Confidence67Medium

2 of 2 checks met

Why this count is preferred · 3 met, 0 not met

Met

Wave B retraces 38.2% to 85.4% of wave A
Wave B retraces under 90% of wave A (deeper B waves fit a flat better)
The count starts at the price extreme of the prior swing (a new trend begins where the old one ended)

Not met

None.

MethodPattern Confidence = (guidelines met + 2) ÷ (guidelines measured + 4), from the rulebook's guidelines, Fibonacci tendencies and wave-personality checks (wave 3 speed and volume, wave 5 volume, alternation in time, a start at the prior extreme), alternate waves in Fibonacci ratio, and the rarity of running flats. The alternate is the best-ranked count that tells a different story. It ranks the rule-valid counts against each other; it is not a probability of any outcome.

Structural summary

Viridia Intelligence

Current structure

Candidate interpretations

Candidate interpretations

Fibonacci map

Fibonacci map

Evidence

Setup

Engine details

Structure at a glance

What changed